QUESTIONS? Sonha Castelli, sncastelli@ucsd.edu or 858‐822‐6014.
Your records will only show you as Advanced once you are advanced for a full quarter. For example, to be considered an Advanced student in Fall, 2012, you must complete the steps above by the first day of classes of Fall, 2012. (Since there is not an official Summer quarter at UCSD, it is not possible to advance in the Summer.)
ADVANCEMENT TO CANDIDACY DEADLINE: JUNE 15, 2012
To remain in good academic standing in the PhD program, you must complete all of the steps listed above by June 15, 2012. Extensions require prior approval by the Thesis Advisor and the Graduate Affairs Committee. Students who do not advance by deadline will have a hold placed on their fall quarter registration.
One of the purposes of a Doctoral Committee is to provide students with mentorship and guidance beyond that provided by the Thesis Advisor. UCSD policies on who serves on the committee were developed, in part, to provide some consistency across departments. Exceptions to their policies
require both the Graduate Affairs and Dean's approval. The Department policy of having Departmental Exam Committee members continue to serve on the Doctoral Committee is to provide students with Faculty who, over time, are familiar with the student, their research, and the history of the exams. If a
student has found other Faculty with particular interests pertinent to the research, it is quite permissible to expand the committee to six members; it is not necessary to delete a Departmental Exam Committee member to compensate. A Doctoral Committee must be approved by the Department and then OGS at least two weeks prior to the examination. To assure that the Department meets this deadline, students should inform Sonha Castelli, Ph.D. Coordinator (sncastelli@ucsd.edu) of their committee a minimum of four weeks prior to the examination date.
Below are guidelines for selecting a committee; please contact Sonha if you have questions.
Other members are optional, and there are no constraints.
The Doctoral Committee must be approved by OGS two weeks prior to the Qualifying Exam.
A minimum five‐faculty committee is required. Other members may be appointed at the student's discretion.
Of the five‐member committee:
Subsequent changes to a committee require both Departmental and OGS approval. Please contact Sonha for information.
The University requires a Qualifying Examination for Advancement to Candidacy for the PhD. The purpose of the examination is for students to gain approval of their proposed thesis research project from their Doctoral Committee.
Scheduling the examination. The exam must be scheduled at least two weeks in advance. Students first confirm with ALL of their committee members the date and time of the examination, and then contact Sonha Castelli, Ph.D. Coordinator. Sonha ensures that the necessary papers are filed, the room scheduled, and notices sent. Students submit an abstract to their Doctoral Committee and to Sonha Castelli (sncastelli@ucsd.edu, x26014) at least two weeks before the Qualifying Examination. The abstract is approximately two single‐spaced pages, and it should include a comprehensive description of the proposed thesis research (including key references), its significance, and the progress that has already been made.
The day of the examination, Ph.D. Coordinator ensures the needed forms are in the file. One form is the “Report of Qualifying Examination”. The other form is an internal one. The Thesis Advisor will pick up the file and take it to the exam; the Advisor is in charge of returning the file, also. At the examination, students first give a 30‐minute presentation. The presentation is followed by a question‐answer period when the committee examines students for indications of the knowledge, insight, motivation, and demonstrated productivity required to produce an acceptable thesis in the normal time. The student may or may not be asked to leave the room for a time prior to hearing the committee's evaluation. Students may Pass, Provisionally Pass, or Fail the exam. The committee will inform the student of the results, and will explain any recommendations or requirements. These will be written on the internal form referenced above. The original stays in the student file, and students receive a copy at a later date.