We hope your research is going well, and that you are excited at the prospect of presenting your preliminary findings and proposed thesis project to your Doctoral Committee to Advance to Candidacy for the PhD. This is the last oral exam you will take before you defend your thesis. Please let us know if you have questions about the process or procedures described below. Best of wishes for your continued success!
To officially advance to candidacy, you must complete ALL of these steps:
Your records will only show you as Advanced once you are advanced for a full quarter.
ADVANCEMENT TO CANDIDACY DEADLINE: last day of Finals Week of Spring Quarter
To remain in good academic standing in the PhD program, you must complete all of the steps listed above by the end of Spring Quarter. Extensions require prior approval by the Thesis Adviser, SDSU, and UCSD Graduate Affairs Committee. Students who do not advance by deadline will have a hold placed on their fall quarter registration.
To meet University requirements for naming a doctoral committee, students must submit a “Nomination of Doctoral Committee for the Qualifying Examination” form signed by both UCSD and SDSU. Ph.D. Coordinator can assist you with obtaining and completing this form. Students should email Ph.D. Coordinator their committee names a minimum of four weeks prior to the examination date.
Note: It can take several weeks to obtain all required signatures from both campuses, allow for this in scheduling your exam.
One of the purposes of a doctoral committee is to provide students with mentorship and guidance beyond that provided by the Thesis Adviser. Requirements on who serves on the committee were developed, in part, to provide some consistency across departments. Exceptions to these policies require both Graduate Affairs and Deans’ approval. The Department policy of having Departmental Exam Committee members continue to serve on the doctoral committee is to provide students with faculty who, over time, are familiar with the student, their research, and the history of the exams. If a student has found other faculty with particular interests pertinent to the research, it is quite permissible to expand the committee to additional members; it is not necessary to delete a Departmental Exam Committee member to compensate. Students should inform the Ph.D. Coordinator of their committee a minimum of four weeks prior to the examination date. Below are guidelines for selecting a committee.
A minimum committee of five faculty members is required. Other members may be appointed at the student's discretion. Of the five-member committee:
The University requires a Qualifying Examination for Advancement to Candidacy for the PhD. The purpose of the examination is for students to gain approval of their proposed thesis research project from their Doctoral Committee.
Scheduling the examination. The exam must be scheduled at least two weeks in advance. Students first confirm with ALL of their committee members the date and time of the examination, and then contact the Ph.D. Coordinator.
Students submit a summary to their doctoral committee and to the Ph.D. Coordinator at least two weeks before the Qualifying Examination. The summary should include a comprehensive description of the proposed thesis research (including key references), its significance, and the progress that has already been made.
The day of the examination, Ph.D. Coordinator ensures the needed forms in the file. The Thesis Advisor will pick up the file and take it to the exam; the advisor is in charge of returning the file.
At the examination, students first give a 30-minute presentation. The presentation is followed by a question-answer period when the committee examines students for indications of the knowledge, insight, motivation, and demonstrated productivity required to produce an acceptable thesis in the normal time. The student may or may not be asked to leave the room for a time prior to hearing the committee's evaluation. Students may Pass, Provisionally Pass, or Fail the exam. The committee will inform students of the results, and will explain any recommendations or requirements. These will be written on the internal “Comments” form; original stays in the student file, and students receive a copy.
As a student in the Joint Doctoral Program, signatures are required from both campuses and thus, unfortunately, several trips between the two campuses are required in order to acquire the necessary signatures. Once a student has fully passed the Oral Qualifying Examination, the committee will sign the “Report of Qualifying Examination” form. The file is then returned by the thesis advisor to the Student Affairs Office. The Ph.D. Coordinator ensures that required Departmental review/signatures (by the Vice Chair for Education) are requested for “Final Report of the Qualifying Exam” form. Students are responsible for following up with the Ph.D. Coordinator after exam regarding the pick-up of “final” paperwork required for filing/fee payment. Be certain to ALLOW REASONABLE TIME between contacting Ph.D. Coordinator for pickup of forms and the advancement deadline. Files with original paperwork may take 2-3 days to return to Ph.D. Coordinator and/or availability of required Departmental reviews/signatures may require 1-2 days.
Student Affairs strives to notify students quickly when forms are ready for pickup; students should follow up with Ph.D. Coordinator on readiness of forms for required signatures by the SDSU JDP Graduate Advisor. After acquiring this signature, the student brings the form back to UCSD and pays the Advancement to Candidacy fee to the UCSD Cashier. Next, the student signs the form and brings it to Rita Baumann at SDSU for the required signature from the Graduate Division and Research Dean at SDSU. From there, the forms are mailed (by Rita) to the Graduate Division and the process is complete.
Congratulations, you are now Advanced to Candidacy for the Ph.D.!